where θFC and θPWPare water content at field capacity, here considered at -33 kPa, and permanent wilting point (PWP) at -1500 kPa, respectively (m3 m-3).
The air capacity, AC (m3 m-3), indicates the soil aeration (Reynolds et al., 2009) and was defined by White (2006):
\begin{equation} \text{AC}=\theta_{s}-\theta_{-10kpa}\nonumber \\ \end{equation}
where θs and θ-10kPa are water content at saturation and at a matric potential of -10 kPa. The macroporosity, MacPOR (m3 m-3), gives the volume of large pores (i.e., > 300 µm equivalent diameter according to the capillary equation), and represents the ability of the soil to quickly drain excess water and facilitate root proliferation (Reynolds et al., 2009). It can be formulated as:
\begin{equation} \text{MacPOR}=\theta_{s}-\theta_{m}\nonumber \\ \end{equation}
where θm is the soil-matrix porosity (MatPOR, m3 m-3). According to Greenland (1977), MacPOR can be seen as drained pores with an equivalent diameter of >50 µm. Then, using the capillary equation, the soil-matric potential corresponding to this pore diameter is -6 kPa.
2.5. Soil biological analysis
Two composite soil samples per plot were taken at 0-10 cm depths in the first week of August 2013 when the soil moisture was at about field capacity to determine the soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) using substrate-induced respiration (SIR) method (Anderson and Domsch, 1978). Soil microbial biomass carbon was calculated according to (Schinner et al., 1996) using the following equation.
\begin{equation} \text{RQ}=\frac{\left(B-D\right)x2.2x100}{4xSWxDM}\nonumber \\ \end{equation}
Where RQ is respiratory quotient in milligram of CO2 per 100 gram of soil per hour, B is volume of HCl consumed by blanks (ml), S is volume of HCl consumed by samples (ml), 4 is incubation time (h), 100 is conversion factor (100 g dm), 2.2 is a conversion factor (1 ml 0.1 M HCl corresponds to 2.2 tolerant mg CO2), SW is the initial soil weight (g), DM is the soil dry matter (%). It is assumed that a respiratory quotient of 1.1 mg CO2 .100 g-1 dm. h-1 corresponds to 20.6 mg biomass-C.100g-1 dm (Erkossa et al., 2007). Thus, this factor was used to convert CO2 to SMBC.
Two soil samples per plot were also taken at 0-10 cm soil depth during the growing season in mid-August 2013 to determine soil bacteria and fungi. The bacteria and fungi populations in the soil were determined by culture methods as described in Benson (2001).
Two composite soil samples per plot were taken during the growing season in mid-August 2013 to assess AMF spore density. AMF spores were separated from each dried soil sample by wet sieving and decanting process, followed by flotation centrifugation in 50% sucrose as described in Brundrett et al. (1996). Spore density was enumerated as spore number per gram of air-dry soil.
Samples of wheat roots were taken mid-August 2013 to measure percent root length colonized by AMF structures such as AMF hyphae, arbuscules and vesicles. A portion of each root sample was washed with 10% KOH and autoclaved (121 0C for 15 min), acidified with 3% HCl (v/v) for 30 min at room temperature. Cleared roots were transferred into a staining solution of Trypan blue (0.05% w/v) in lactoglycerol (1:1:1, lactic acid: glycerol: distilled water), and autoclaved at 1210C for 15 min (Brundrett et al., 1996). Then, stained roots were left in a de-staining solution (50% glycerol). Finally, percentage of root AMF colonization was assessed using the gridline intersect method (Giovannetti and Mosse, 1980) under a compound microscope (100–400 times magnification) (Mc Gonigle et al., 1990). Presence of arbuscules, internal hyphae and vesicules was recorded from each intersect and expressed as a percentage of total root intersect. At each intersection, there were six possible mutually exclusive outcomes (Brundrett et al., 1996) and the line might intersect at p, q, r, s, t and u.
where p is the intersection at no fungal structures are seen, q is arbuscules, r is mycorrhizal vesicles, s is arbuscules and mycorrhizal vesicles, t is mycorrhizal hyphae but no arbuscules or mycorrhizal vesicles, and u is hyphae not seen to be connected to arbuscules or mycorrhizal vesicles.
A reasonable estimate of percentage of root length colonization was done from 100 or more intersections for each root sample:
\(G=p+q+r+s+t+u\)
where G is the total intersect inspected. The percentage of root length colonization by hyphae of all types was calculated as hyphal colonization (HC):
\begin{equation} HC=100\left\lceil\frac{G-P}{G}\right\rceil\nonumber \\ \end{equation}
The percentage of root length colonized by AMF hyphae (MHC) was calculated as:
\begin{equation} \ MHC=100\left[\frac{q+r+s+t}{G}\right]\nonumber \\ \end{equation}
The percentages of root length colonization by arbuscules, and the percentage of root length colonized by mycorrhizal vesicles, was calculated as arbuscular colonization (AMC)
\(AMC=100\left[\frac{q+s}{G}\right]\) and vesicle colonization (VC):\(VC=100\left[\frac{r+s}{G}\right]\).
2.6. Crop yield and straw
The crop grown in rotation during this study period in 2013 was wheat. Grain and straw yield of wheat was determined at harvest from areas of 1 m × 1 m in three replicates per plot.
2.7. Data Analysis
ANOVA was used with student t-tests at α = 0.05 to test for statistical differences in soil properties and crop yield between the treatments. The data on percentage of AMF colonization and spore density was transformed using a logarithmic function followed by ANOVA analysis to test the statistical differences on the effects of treatments on AMF. Data were analyzed using the SAS statistical software (JMP version 11.0), and the standard error of treatment means was used for separation of means.
To understand the pathways linking management practices (CT, CF and PRB) to soil health (soil biology and soil properties) and ultimately to crop productivity, we used piecewise structural equation modelling.
Structural equation modelling (SEM) has been used extensively in psychology (MacCallum and Austin, 2000) and to a lesser extent in ecology (Pugesek et al., 2003). Its use remains limited in soil science, though it is a powerful method to develop causal understanding of the drivers of ecological interactions and processes in soils, instead of focusing solely on patterns, as argued by Eisenhauer et al. (2015). SEM is based on the use of cause-effect (i.e., structural) equations (two or more) to model multivariate relationships (Grace, 2006). It is related to regression, principal components analysis, and path analysis, but in addition to these methods, SEM provides a means to evaluate the structure of the model (i.e., direct and indirect relationships among variables) as well as the model parameters using observed data (McCune and Grace, 2002). As such, SEM can be used to test construct models (i.e., hypothesized models) and quantify relationships between model components (Grace, 2006).
A construct model was developed to test the pathways linking management practices to indicators of soil biology, indicators of soil properties, and wheat grain yield (Fig. 4). Because of the limited degree of freedom, only indicators of soil biology and soil properties could be used, and not the whole range of variables measured in this study. The density of bacteria and the density of fungi were used as proxy of soil biology. Regarding soil properties, the soil organic carbon in the top 10 cm of soil was used as proxy of soil fertility, the KFS as proxy of soil hydraulic properties, and the SI as proxy of soil structural properties.
Management practices were represented by two binary variables: contour furrowing (yes/no) and permanent raised bed (yes/no). Due to these two factorial variables and because SEM assumed a normal distribution for all the variables included in the model, we used piecewise structural equation modelling (PSEM). In this extension to SEM, paths are estimated in individual models and then pieced together to construct the causal model (www.jonlefcheck.net/2014/07/06/piecewise-structural-equation-modeling-inecological-research). This was performed using the R package piecewise SEM .
3. Results
3.1. Effects on biotic soil properties
Soil microbial biomass C, bacterial colony and fungi population were higher in PRB compared to CF systems and lowest CT (Table 1). Soil microbial biomass C was highest with PRB and least with CT at 0-10 cm soil depth, while CF showed intermediate values. Higher populations of bacteria colonies and fungus mycelia were recorded with PRB followed by CF compared to CT treatment (Table 1). The bacterial and fungi populations were highest under PRB and lowest in CT (Table 1 and 2).
AMF spore abundance and root colonization of wheat crops by the different AMF structures were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the treatments (Table 2). Higher AMF colonization was observed in PRB in HC, MHC, AC and VC as compared to CT (Table 1). There was significantly higher percentage of wheat root length colonized by AMF hyphae with PRB (88%) compared with CF (74%) and CT (58 %) systems.
3.2. Effects on abiotic soil properties
Soil aggregate stability index was significantly higher in CA-based treatments as compared with CT at 0-15 cm depth (Table 3) but not at 15-30 cm depth. The highest soil aggregate stability was observed on PRB and CF compared to CT on both soil depths (Table 3). PRB had higher KFS than CT treatment. However, CF did not show a significant different KFS in comparison with PRB and CT. The bulk density of the topsoil (0-10 cm) as derived from SSCC was, at higher soil water potential with higher soil moisture content, lower with PRB compared to CF and CT treatments. However, there was no significant difference in bulk density among treatments at low soil water potential when the soil was dry. The bulk density changed from about one Mg m-3 (at higher soil matric potential, swelling) to 1.71 Mg m-3 (at lower soil matric potential, shrinking) (Fig. 5).
The SWRC in Fig. 6 indicates significantly higher soil water content in PRB followed by CF and lowest in CT at higher soil matric potential while there was no significant difference at lower soil matric potentials.
The SOC was significantly higher (p < 0.05) with PRB than CF and CT at zero – 10 cm soil depth (Fig. 7). Similarly, SOC was significantly higher with CA-based treatments as compared to CT at both the subsoil depths (10-20 cm and 20-30 cm). Also higher total soil N was recorded in CA-based treatments (PRB and PC) than CT treatment (Table 4). The highest soil C: N ratio was found in CT followed by CF and the lowest with PRB (Table 4). Besides, available P was significantly higher in PRB followed by CF as compared to CT at 0-10 cm soil depth (Table 4). As expected, neither CEC nor texture was affected by the treatments, and change in soil pH was not significant (Table 3).
3.3. Effects on soil functions
The average SOC sequestration rates (Mg C ha-1yr-1) within the 0–10 cm soil depth was higher in PRB (0.62) followed by CF (0.49) and lowest with CT (0.25) over 8 years between 2006 and 2013 following the implementation of CA-based practices (Table 4). The total SOC added to the soil over 8 years (between 2006 to 2013) in the topsoil (0–10 cm soil depth) was significantly higher with PRB (4.31 Mg ha-1) followed by CF (3.45 Mg ha-1) and lowest with CT (1.72 Mg ha-1) (Table 4).
PAWC, MacPOR and AC were significantly higher with PRB compared to CT (Table 4) indicating the improvements in water storage capacity, internal drainage and soil aeration in PRB. Soil N and available P were significantly higher in PRB as compared to CT signifying the improvements in nutrient availability in the CA-based systems.
Wheat grain and straw yields were significantly higher (P < 0.05) with PRB followed by CF as compared to CT (Table 5) demonstrating the improvement in soil functioning in terms of food production in the CA-based systems (Table 6).
3.4 Structural equation modeling
Outputs of the PSEM revealed two pathways linking CF and PRB to improved wheat yield in the conditions of the study: (1) via an increase of the density of bacteria and an improvement of KFS, and (2) via an increase in the density of fungi and an increase of soil organic carbon content in the topsoil.
Both CF and PRB were found to have a positive effect on the density of both fungi and bacteria, though the effect of PRB was around twice the effect of CF on these microorganisms (Table 6; Fig. 8). A positive relationship between the density of bacteria and KFS, and a positive relationship between, the density of fungi and SOC content in the topsoil, were found. Both KFS and SOC content in the topsoil were found to have a positive impact on wheat grain yield. No statistically significant relationship between SI and wheat grain yield was found. Similarly, no statistically significant relationship between the densities of bacteria and fungi on SI was found (thus, SI doesn’t feature on Fig. 8).
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects on biotic soil properties
The highest SMBC was obtained in PRB at the upper soil surface followed by CF, confirming that CA-based systems can improve microbial activities (Madejón et al., 2007). The increase in SMBC in PRB and CF corresponds to the increased SOC and soil N. Higher SMBC may indicate increased potentially available N (Hart, et al., 1986). Retaining crop residue was not only relevant to improve SOC and N but also to enhance soil water storage by mulching the soil surface that limits water loss in the form of evaporation (Araya et al., 2015). The main sources of crop residue during the experimental period that have better soil surface cover were crops with high C: N ratios that include wheat (80:1) and barley (85:1) (Flower et al., 2012), while grass pea and tef residues (low C: N ratio crops) had short life span as soil surface cover due to fast decomposition rate. The residue of tef retained from previous season (2012) was completely decomposed before planting in June 2013 while residue of wheat and barley resist decomposition until next cropping season (personal observation). Wheat and barley had higher impact on SOC while lower on soil N as the crop straw has higher C and smaller N content. On the other hand, the legume crops have higher capacity to generate soil N whereas its role in terms of soil surface cover was negligible. Tef residue covers only about 20% of the target soil surface immediately after harvest as compared to the 60% residue cover in barley and wheat, although there was no straw retained during grass pea cropping. Growing dryland legumes such as grass pea in rotation or as cover crop with low C: N ratio as part of the CA-based systems can improve soil N availability (Flower et al., 2012). However, the fresh crop residue retained in CA-based systems might increase immobilization of soil N substantiating the need for N fertilizer application as part of the early stages of CA-based systems (Chávez-Romero et al., 2016).
There was significant difference in bacteria and fungi population among treatments indicating the improvements in CA-based systems. The highest bacterial and fungi population in PRB followed by CF could be attributed to the increased SOC and N source and reduced soil disturbances in the CA-based treatments. Similar results were reported in other CA studies (Six et al., 2002; Lienhard et al., 2013). Wang et al. (2011) and Fierer et al. (2012) reported that CA had significantly higher SOC, soil N and microbial biomass and higher association of AMF with the crops as compared to CT.
Higher AMF spore density and colonization of wheat roots in CA-based treatments as compared to CT indicates that minimizing soil disturbance in CA-based treatments increases the spore (Table 2; Fig. 8). Jansa et al. (2002) reported an increase in mycorrhizal spores and root colonization on several crops with minimum tillage compared with CT practices. Minimal soil disturbance and the stability of the soil surface in CA-based treatments could prevent the fungi mycelium from being fragmented and promote production and expansion of AMF (Mc Gonigle et al., 1990; Kabir, 2005). If the AMF hyphal network is not disrupted, the next crop could be more rapidly connected to the network and have higher nutrient absorption capacity. Helgason et al. (2010) also reported AMF hyphae are sensitive to physical disruption by tillage. AMF spores germinate under suitable conditions of the soil matrix, temperature, CO2 concentration, pH and P concentration (Helgason et al., 2010), and increase in the carbon supplied by the plant to the AMF can increase the uptake of P (Miller, 1992). AMF has reportedly increased nutrient uptake, salinity tolerance, drought tolerance, water uptake, root disease resistance, and photosynthesis (Srivastava, 1996; Sharmaet al., 1994). AMF extension of the plant root surface facilitates potential uptake and translocation of P, N, K, Ca, S, Cu, Mo, and Zn (Srivastava, 1996; Frey and Ellis, 1997). However, nutrient uptake by plants grown in CT can be lower than grown in CA-based systems (Miller, 1992). Kabir (2005) also reported that P concentrations were significantly greater with CA than with CT. The higher association AMF in the PRB and CF could help to increase the availability of P in the root zone and direct uptake by the crops. Al-Karaki et al. (2004) AMF colonization of roots has been shown to increase the uptake of water and drought resistance of wheat. Similarly, the wheat root colonization of AMF in this study was found to be higher in CA-based systems as compared to CT.
4.2. Effects on abiotic soil properties
The soil aggregate stability was significantly higher in CA-based systems as compared to CT (Table 3) implicating improvements for a number of soil physicochemical properties including water infiltration, water holding capacity, oxygen supply, and organic matter mineralization rates (Feller et al., 1996; Six et al., 2004). Minimum soil disturbance and increased SOC through retaining crop residue can improve aggregate stability, bulk density and porosity as well as the soil moisture and air regime that, altogether, stimulate the activities of the soil organisms. The bulk density was decreased significantly with PRB followed by CF planting systems compared to CT at higher soil water potential but non-significantly at lower matric potentials. The lowest bulk density at higher soil water potential with PRB planting system indicates higher capacity to conserve water in the root zone and improves soil productivity. It is well established that addition of SOM can not only reduce bulk density and increase water holding capacity, but also effectively increase soil aggregate stability (Kay and Angers, 2001). Similarly, higher soil water content were observed in CA-based systems as compared to CT at higher soil matric potentials indicating the impacts of SOC. Field saturated hydraulic conductivity were shown to increase with PRB and CF as compared to CT (Table 3) confirming the improvement in porosity of the soil at higher soil matric potentials.
Soil biological constituents such as bacteria and fungi can influence the formation and stabilization of soil aggregates (Table 6; Fig. 8; Six et al., 2004; Lavelle and Martin, 1992). Beare et al. (1997) showed that fungal hyphae were responsible for about 40% of the macroaggregation (>2000 um) and significantly greater retention of SOM under no-tillage soils than in CT. Mathew et al. (2012) reported that the population of bacteria and fungi like AMF and actinobacteria was higher in CA systems due to improvement in physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of the soil.
4.3. Effects on soil functions
Soil function indicators encompass carbon transformation, nutrient cycling, soil water and nutrient availability, soil structure, gas exchange, adequate rooting depth and food production (Adhikari and Hartemink, 2016). SOM provides nutrients and habitat to soil biota and contributes to particle aggregation, enhancing the physical structure of soils and then promoting aeration, water infiltration, and resistance to erosion and crusting (Horwath, 2007). The SOC sequestration rate (Mg C ha-1 yr-1) was higher with PRB (0.62) followed by CF (0.49) and lowest with CT (0.25) (Table 4) indicating the potential of CA-based systems to play a role in the mitigation of greenhouse gases. The highest SOC sequestration rate reported in humid climates regions under no-till system was 0.22 Mg C ha–1 y–1 while 0.10 Mg C ha–1 y–1 in arid climates (Six et al., 2002). Lal (2004a) reported that an average long-term rate of SOC sequestration with no-tillage practices is 0.2 to 1 Mg C ha–1 y–1 for humid temperate regions while 0.05 to 0.25 Mg C ha–1y–1 for dry tropical regions. These rates are low compared to the average sequestration rate of 0.48 Mg C ha–1 y–1 reported by West et al. (2002). The weed biomass retained after killing by glyphosate in CA-based systems in our study and incorporated by tillage in CT instead of being grazed by livestock as at nearby farmers’ crop fields might contribute to increase the SOC stock and sequestration rates in all treatments. Also the crop rotations and fertilizers added in all treatments might enhance root biomass and absence of aftermath overgrazing after harvesting in CT like that of CA-based systems might have increased the SOC stock in CT. The rate of SOC sequestration is also affected by the quantity and quality of biomass returned to the soil. Several studies revealed that the high potential of CA system for SOC sequestration (Lal, 2004a; Lal, 2004b; de M et al., 2001). Soil organic matter plays an important role in soil function determining soil biological quality (provision of substrate and nutrients for microbes), chemical quality (buffering and pH changes) and physical quality (water holding capacity and stabilization of soil structure) properties and susceptibility of soil to degradation (Kabir et al., 1998). Soil aeration is one of the most important determinants of soil productivity because it determines the level of oxygen in the soil (Kibblewhite et al., 2007). CA-based systems had higher AC as compared to CT indicating a better wheat growth rate in CA-based systems. Plants are sensitive to the soil aeration status of the soil (Hatfield et al., 2017).
The higher bulk density in PRB followed by CF as compared to CT at higher soil water potential and a similar trend in aggregate stability among treatments confirms the improvement in soil structure. The higher aggregate stability in CA-based systems as compared to CT could imply high resistances of the soil to erosion, raindrop and surface sealing. Thus, PAWC was significantly affected by treatments due to the improved soil structure in PRB in comparison with CT. The higher bulk density in CA-based systems as compared to CT at higher soil water potential while there was no significant change at lower soil water potential indicates as the improvement in PAWC was due to enhanced soil structure but not soil texture. Higher PAWC in CA-based systems as compared to CT system shows the importance of CA-based systems for climate change adaptation. Higher macroporosity (MacPOR) was observed in PRB than CF and CT proving the improvement in the ability of the soil to quickly drain excess water and facilitate root proliferation (Reynolds et al., 2009). Improving drainage in Vertisols can reduce the denitrification process while it can enhance aerobic condition in the soil and nutrient availability. The study area receives the highest amount of rainfall in August every year that made waterlogging a common phenomenon in the study area with poorly drained crop fields (Araya et al., 2015). On the other hand, the high oxygen demands due to crop residue retention that increased microbial activities in general might be a cause for oxygen deficiency and nitrate respiration in CA-based systems. MacPOR refers to the void spaces with diameter > 50 µm formed by soil aggregate formation in finer textured soil with higher SOM. The higher SOC sequestration rates and storage with an increase in PAWC in CA-based systems demonstrates that they can play a vital role to reduce net CO2emissions and protect the livelihoods of the poor through adapting and mitigating climate change. Adaptation strategies of CA-based systems are related to improvement in PAWC in the root zone and thus minimize the effects of declining rainfall and dry spells and high soil surface temperature through retaining crop residue on crop yields (Giller et al., 2009). In addition, the improvements in MacPOR in CA-based systems contribute to draining excess rainfall and reduce crop yield loss due to waterlogging.
The suitability of soil for s ustaining plant growth and biological activity is a function of its physical properties (porosity, infiltration rate, water holding capacity, soil structure). Food production such as crop yield is an indicator of the soil functioning (Hatfield et al., 2017). The highest grain and straw yields were recorded in PRB compared to CF and lowest in CT (Table 5 and 6) indicating an improvement in soil properties of the PRB treatments (Table 6; Fig. 8). The higher wheat yield with CA-based practices as compared to CT was due to cumulative positive changes that occurred on bacteria, fungi, SOC and KFS in the CA-based systems (Table 6; Fig. 8). CA-based systems compared to CT improved SMBC and bacteria and fungi density of microorganisms (Table 1 and 2). An increase in SMBC, bacteria and fungi density can improve nutrient cycling and absorption of nutrients by plant roots (Kabir et al., 1998; Chávez-Romero et al., 2016) that might support the improvements in crop yields under CA-based systems. FAO (2018) also reported from the same experimental plots that the greater yield in CA-based systems was due to lower weed density, reduced tillage, crop residue management, in-situ water and soil conservation and less runoff and higher rainwater use efficiency. Chávez-Romero et al. (2016) reported similar findings.
4.4 Structural equation modeling
CA-based practices (PRB and CF) influenced soil biological properties such as density of bacteria and fungi significantly and thus, enhanced KFS and SOC, respectively (Table 6; Fig. 8; Six et al., 2004). Increased density of bacteria in CA-based systems positively affected KFS and improved wheat yield with PRB followed by CF as compared to CT (Table 6; Fig. 8). Frankenberger (1979) and many other authors reported that an increase in bacteria density reduced KFS in short-term experiments because of blockage of pores by the bacteria. However, long-term effects of bacteria improved KFS that led to improvements in wheat yield (Fig. 8) in this study might be associated to the incorporation of dead bacteria into the soil. Similar to the bacteria effects, increased fungi density have a positive effect on SOC accumulation (Table 6; Fig. 8). On other hand, an increased SOC have improved wheat yield in CA-based systems as compared to CT. Plants allocate a substantial portion of their photosynthetic products belowground to support their root systems (Gill and Finzi, 2016). The fate of this carbon includes root structures, root symbionts, autotrophic (root and root symbiont) respiration, storage compounds, exudates, volatile organic compounds, and the extraradical fungal hyphae associated with mycorrhizal roots. The fungal hyphae provides an efficient mechanism for distributing plant carbon throughout the soil, facilitating its deposition into soil pores and onto mineral surfaces, where it can be protected from microbial attack (Frey, 2019). According to Frey (2019), mycorrhizal exudates and dead tissues contribute to play a dominant role in SOC formation and stabilization.
5. Conclusions
The present study suggests clearly that CA-based systems can significantly alter physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the soil and influence the functional capacity of the soil as compared to CT systems. Abiotic soil properties such as bulk density, aggregate stability and KFS were significantly higher in CA-based systems compared to CT while there was no significant difference in pH and CEC. SMBC, bacteria and fungi population and AMF spore density were significantly improved with PRB followed by CF and lowest in CT. SOC sequestration rates, nutrient availability such as soil N and P, water availability (PAWC), drainage for excess rainwater (MacPOR), soil aeration (AC) and food production (wheat grain yield) were significantly improved with CA-based systems as compared to CT through minimizing soil disturbance and retention of crop residues at harvesting in CF and PRB systems. AMF spore abundance and root length colonization was also enhanced due to low level of soil disturbance in PRB and CF. However, the full benefit of permanent raised beds plus CA can only be expected after several years. Notwithstanding the overall better results of PRB compared to CF, the latter tillage system can be recommended as a first step for improving soil health whilst increasing crop yield. The long-term goal should be to achieve a permanent raised bed planting system along with the use of crop residues (PRB). Hence, CA-based systems (PRB and CF) can be recommended for large-scale dissemination and implementation to improve soil health and wheat yield on Vertisols and possibly on other soils in northern Ethiopia.
References
Adhikari, K., Hartemink, A.E. 2016. Linking soils to ecosystem services—A global review. Geoderma. 15;262: 101-11.
Al-Karaki, G., McMichael, B.Z.A.K.J., Zak, J., 2004. Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress. Mycorrhiza14 (4), pp.263-269.
Anderson, J.P.E., Domsch, K.H. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil biology and biochemistry, 10(3), pp.215-221.
Anderson, T.A., Guthrie, E.A., Walton, B.T. 1993. Bioremediation in the rhizosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 2630–2636
Araya, T., Nyssen, J., Govaerts, B., Deckers, J. Cornelis, W.M. 2015. Impacts of medium term conservation agriculture-based farming systems on optimizing seasonal rainfall partitioning and productivity on Vertisols in northern Ethiopia. Soil Tillage Res. 148, 1-13.
Araya T, Nyssen, J, Govaerts B, Deckers, J, Sommer, R., Bauer, H, Gebrehiwot, K, Cornelis, W.M. 2016a. Seven years resource-conserving agriculture effect on soil quality and crop productivity in the Ethiopian drylands. Soil and Tillage Research. 163:99-109.
Beare MH, Hu S, Coleman DC, Hendrix PF. 1997. Influences of mycelial fungi on soil aggregation and organic matter storage in conventional and no-tillage soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 5(3):211-9.
Benson, H. J. 2001. Microbiological Applications: A Laboratory Manual in General Microbiology. /Harold J. Benson. USA: The McGraw− Hill Companies, pp 76-200.
Bezuayehu, T., Gezahegn, A., Yigezu, A., Jabbar, M.A., Paulos, D. 2002. Nature and causes of land degradation in the Oromiya Region: a review. Socio-economics and Policy Research Working Paper 36. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya, 34 pp.
Bremner, J.M., Mulvaney, C.S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Black, C.A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Agronomy Series No. 9. ASA, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 595– 624.
Brundrett, M., Bougher, N., Dell, B., Giove, T., Malajczuk, N. 1996.Working with mycorrhiza in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monograph, 32
Bünemann, E.K., Bongiorno, G, Bai, Z., Creamer, R.E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V, Kuyper, T.W., Mäder, P., Pulleman, M. 2018. Soil quality–A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1; 120:105-25.
Cerdeira, A.L., Gazziero, D.L., Duke, S.O., Matallo, M.B. 2010. Agricultural impacts of glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivation in South America. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry59 (11), pp.5799-5807.
Chávez-Romero, Y., Navarro-Noya, Y.E., Reynoso-Martínez, S.C., Sarria-Guzmán, Y., Govaerts, B., Verhulst, N, Dendooven, L, Luna-Guido, M. 2016. 16S metagenomics reveals changes in the soil bacterial community driven by soil organic C, N-fertilizer and tillage-crop residue management. Soil and Tillage Research. 159:1-8.
Cornelis, W.M., Khlosi, M., Hartmann, R., Van Meirvenne, M., De Vos, B. 2005. Comparison of unimodal analytical expressions for the soil-water retention curve. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 69(6):1902-11.
Cornelis, W.M., Corluy, J., Medina, H., Hartmann, R., Van Meirvenne, M., Ruiz, M. 2006. A simplified parametric model to describe the magnitude and geometry of soil shrinkage. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 258–268.
De Leenheer, L. 1959. Werkwijzen van de analysen aan het Centrum voor Grondonderzoek. Rijkslandbouwhogeschool Gent, Ghent.
de M, S., Carlos, J., Cerri, C.C., Dick, W.A., Lal, R., Solismar Filho, P.V., Piccolo, M.C., Feigl, B.E., 2001. Organic matter dynamics and carbon sequestration rates for a tillage chronosequence in a Brazilian Oxisol. Soil Science Society of America Journal65 (5), pp.1486-1499.
Doran, J.W., Zeiss, M.R. 2000. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied soil ecology, 15(1):3-11.
Eisenhauer, N., Bowker, M. A., Grace, J. B., and Powell, J. R. 2015. From patterns to causal understanding: Structural equation modeling (SEM) in soil ecology. Pedobiologia (Jena). 58, 65–72. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.03.002.
Ellis, J.M., Griffin, J.L. 2002. Soybean (Glycine max) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technology16 (3), pp.580-586.
Erkossa, T., Itanna, F., Stah, K. 2007. Microbial Biomass carbon as a sensitive indicator of soil quality changes. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Reso 9, 141–153.
FAO, 2018. What is conservation agriculture? http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/laa.htmi,(accessed 28 February 2018)
Feller, C., Albrecht, A., Tessier, D. 1996. Aggregation and organic matter storage in kaolinitic and smectitic tropical soils. Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils. 309-59.
Feng, P.C., Baley, G.J., Clinton, W.P., Bunkers, G.J., Alibhai, M.F., Paulitz, T.C., Kidwell, K.K. 2005. Glyphosate inhibits rust diseases in glyphosate-resistant wheat and soybean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102 (48), pp.17290-17295.
Fierer, N., Lauber, C.L., Ramirez, K.S., Zaneveld, J., Bradford, M.A., Knight, R. 2012. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic, and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 61, 1007–1017
Flower, K.C., Cordingley, N., Ward, PR., Weeks, C. 2012. Nitrogen, weed management and economics with cover crops in conservation agriculture in a Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Research. 132:63-75.
Frankenberger Jr, W.T., Troeh, F.R., Dumenil, L.C. 1979. Bacterial effects on hydraulic conductivity of soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(2), pp.333-338.
Frey, S.D. 2019. Mycorrhizal Fungi as Mediators of Soil Organic Matter Dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 50, pp.237-259.
Frey, J.E., Ellis, J.R. 1997. Relationship of soil properties and soil amendments to response of Glomus intraradices and soybeans. Can. J. Bot. 75:483-491.
Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., Kassam, A. 2012. Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports. The journal of field actions.Special Issue 6.
Giesy, J.P., Dobson, S., Solomon, K.R., 2000. Ecotoxicological risk assessment for Roundup® herbicide. In Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology (pp. 35-120). Springer, New York, NY.
Gill, A.L., Finzi, A.C. 2016. Belowground carbon flux links biogeochemical cycles and resource-use efficiency at the global scale. Ecol. Lett. 19:1419–28
Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., Tittonell, P. 2009. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field crops research. 114(1):23-34.
Giovannetti, M., Mosse, B. 1980. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol, 84:489–500
Grace, J.B. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems. Cambridge. Cambridge, U.K. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=1suuMOChHWcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA326&dq=grace+2006+structural+equation&ots=Fl0DxeykVp&sig=O2H2LJvHxia2fmGrgPB5I_GE7dY#v=onepage&q=grace 2006 structural equation&f=false.
Greenland, D.J. 1977. Soil damage by intensive arable cultivation: temporary or permanent? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 281 (980):193-208.
Hart, P.B.S., Sparling, G.P., Kings, J.A. 1986. Relationship between mineralisable nitrogen and microbial biomass in a range of plant litters, peats, and soils of moderate to low pH. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Res. 29: 681-686.
Hatfield, J.L., Sauer, T.J., Cruse, R.M. 2017. Soil: The forgotten piece of the water, food, energy nexus. In Advances in Agronomy Vol. 143, pp. 1-46. Academic Press.
He, X.H., Critchley, C., Bledsoe, C. 2003. Nitrogen transfer within and between plants through common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs). Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 22 (6), pp.531-567.
Helgason, B.L., Walley, F.L., Germida, J.J. 2010. No-till soil management increases microbial biomass and alters community profiles in soil aggregates. Applied Soil Ecology, 46: 390-397. DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.10.002
Helgason, T., Daniell, T.J., Husband, R., Fitter, A.H., Young, J.P.W. 1998. Ploughing up the wood-wide web?. Nature, 394(6692), pp.431-431.
Horwath, W. 2007. Carbon cycling and formation of soil organic matter, in: E.A. Paul (Ed.), Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry, third ed., Elsevier, USA, pp. 303-339.
Jansa, J., Mozafar, A., Anken, T., Ruh, R., Sanders, I., Frossard, E. 2002. Diversity and structure of AMF communities as affected by tillage in a temperate soil. Mycorrhiza. 1;12 (5):225-34.
Kabir, Z. 2005. Tillage or no-tillage: impact on mycorrhizae. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1;85 (1):23-9.
Kabir, Z., O’Halloran, I.P., Widden, P., Hamel, C. 1998. Vertical distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under corn (Zea mays L.) in no-till and conventional tillage systems, Mycorrhiza 8, 53–55.
Kay, B.D., Angers, D.A. 2001. Soil Structure. Soil physics companion.249.
Kemper, W.D., Rosenau, R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 425–442
Kibblewhite, M.G., Ritz, K, Swift, M.J. 2007. Soil health in agricultural systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 363(1492):685-701.
Kremer, R., Means, N. Kim, S. 2005. Glyphosate affects soybean root exudation and rhizosphere micro-organisms. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry85 (15), pp.1165-1174.
Laitinen, P., Rämö, S., Siimes, K. 2007. Glyphosate translocation from plants to soil–does this constitutes a significant proportion of residues in soil? Plant and Soil300 (1-2), pp.51-60.
Lal, R. 2004a. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma, 123:1–22
Lal, R. 2004b. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science.  304:1623–1627. doi:10.1126/science.1097396 [PubMed]
Lavelle, P., Martin, A. 1992. Small-scale and large-scale effects of endogeic earthworms on soil organic matter dynamics in soils of the humid tropics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 24(12):1491-8.
Lienhard, P., Tivet, F., Chabanne, A., Dequiedt, S., Lelièvre, M., Sayphoummie, S., Leudphanane, B., Prévost-Bouré, N.C., Séguy, L., Maron, P.A., Ranjard, L. 2013. No-till and cover crops shift soil microbial abundance and diversity in Laos tropical grasslands. Agronomy for sustainable development. 33(2):375-84.
MacCallum, R. C., and Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 201–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.
Madejón, E., Moreno, F., Murillo, J.M., Pelegrín, F. 2007. Soil biochemical response to long-term conservation tillage under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 94, 346-352.
Mathew, R., Feng, Y., Githinji, L., Ankumah, R., Balkcom, K. 2012. Impact of no-tillage and conventional tillage systems on soil microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Soil Science Article ID 548620, p 1-10.
McCune, B., and Grace, J. B. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Softwa. Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
Mc Gonigle, T.P., Miller, M.H., Evans, D.G., Fairchild, D.G., Swann, J.A. 1990. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The New Phytologist,115: 495-501.
Miller, R.M., Jastrow, J.D. 1992. The Role of Mycorrhizal Fungi in Soil Conservation 1. Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture. (mycorrhizaeinsu):29-44.
Mozafar, A., Anken, T., Ruh, R., Frossard, E. 2000. Tillage intensity, mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal fungi, and nutrient concentrations in maize, wheat, and canola. Agronomy Journal. ;92(6):1117-24.
Olsen, S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington.
Opolot, E., Araya, T., Nyssen, J., Al‐Barri, B., Verbist, K., Cornelis, W.M. 2016. Evaluating in Situ Water and Soil Conservation Practices with a Fully Coupled, Surface/Subsurface Process‐Based Hydrological Model in Tigray, Ethiopia. Land Degradation & Development. 27(8):1840-52.
Powlson, D.S, Stirling, C.M, Thierfelder, C., White, R.P., Jat, M.L. 2016. Does conservation agriculture deliver climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration in tropical agro-ecosystems? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 220:164-74.
Pugesek, B. H., Tomer, A., Eye, A. Von (2003). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications in Ecological and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge. Cambridge, U.K. https://books.google.co.zw/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zgjxnPKoKlAC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=structural+equation+modeling+biology&ots=ZxDux2_Yzo&sig=iUXj-0twnCLjgE3sqJlMIMKn0Zs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=structural equation modeling biology&f=false [Accessed January 13, 2020].
Reynolds, W.D., Drury, C.F., Tan, C.S., Fox, C.A., Yang, X.M. 2009. Use of indicators and pore volume-function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma. 152 (3-4):252-63.
Sarukhán, J., Whyte, A., Hassan, R., Scholes, R., Ash, N., Carpenter, S.T., Pingali, P.L., Bennett, E.M., Zurek, M.B., Chopra, K., Leemans, R. 2005. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being.
Sayre, K.D. 1998Ensuring the use of sustainable crop management strategies by small wheat farmers in the 21st century. Wheat special report no. 48. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Schinner, F., Ohlinger, R., Kandeler, E.R., Margesin. 1996. (eds). Indirect estimation of microbial biomass. In ‘Methods in soil biology’. pp. 47–75. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg
Scholenberger, C.J., Simon, R.H. 1945. Determination of exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in soil-ammonium acetate method. Soil Sci.59, 13–24.
Sharma, A.K., Srivastava, P.C., Johri, B.N. 1994. Contribution of VA mycorrhiza to zinc uptake in plants. Biochemistry of Metal Micronutrients in the Rhizosphere. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL , pp.111-124.
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., Denef, K. 2004. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research. 79(1):7-31.
Six, J., Feller, C., Denef, K., Ogle, S.M., Sa, J.C.D., Albrecht, A. 2002. Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils—effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 22:755–775. doi:10.1051/ agro:2002043
Srivastava, D., Kapoor. R., Srivastava, S.K., Mukerji, K.J. 1996. Mycorrhizal research A priority in agriculture. pp. 41-75. In: K.G. Mukerji (ed.), Concepts in Mycorrhizal Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
van Genuchten, M., 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Am. J. 44, 892–898.
Walkley, A., Black, T.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter: and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38.
Wang, Y., Tu, C., Cheng, L., Li, C., Gentry, L.F., Hoyt, G.D., Zhang, X., Hu, S. 2011. Long-term impact of farming practices on soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools and microbial biomass and activity. Soil. Till. Res117, 8–16.
West, T.O., Post, W.M. 2002. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 66(6):1930-46.
White, R., 2006. Principles and Practice of Soil Science, 4 edition Oxford, UK.
Zhou, D.M., Wang, Y.J., Cang, L., Hao, X.Z., Luo, X.S., 2004. Adsorption and cosorption of cadmium and glyphosate on two soils with different characteristics. Chemosphere57 (10), pp.1237-1244.
Table captions Table 1. Soil microbial biomass carbon content, bacteria and fungi population in the different treatment under CA (PRB and CF) and CT in Gum SelasaTable 2. Mycorrhizae spore abundance and root colonization of wheat roots under the different conservation agriculture based systems in Gum SelasaTable 3. Selected physicochemical soil properties in conservation agriculture based systems during the 2013 rainy season in Gum Selasa experimental siteTable 4. Effects of conservation agriculture based systems on soil function at the topsoil (0-10 cm) in in 2013 at Gum Selasa experimental siteTable 5. Effects of conservation agriculture based systems on wheat grain and straw yield during the 2013 rainy season in Gum SelasaTable 6. Estimates and their confidence intervals and associated P-values derived from piecewise structural equation modelling for the predictors of wheat grain yield (YLD), soil organic carbon in the top 10 cm (SOC), hydraulic conductivity (KFS), and soil aggregate stability index (SI). Predictors with an associatedP-value lower than 0.1 are in bold