loading page

Evaluating a potential model to analyze the function of the gut microbiota of the giant panda
  • +11
  • wenping zhang,
  • Junjin Xie,
  • Shan Xia,
  • Xueyan Fan,
  • Stephan Schmitz-Esser,
  • Benhua Zeng,
  • Lijun Zheng,
  • He Huang,
  • Hairui Wang,
  • jincheng zhong,
  • Zhihe Zhang,
  • Liang Zhang,
  • Mingfeng Jiang,
  • Rong Hou
wenping zhang
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Junjin Xie
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding
Author Profile
Shan Xia
Chengdu Normal University
Author Profile
Xueyan Fan
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding
Author Profile
Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Iowa State University
Author Profile
Benhua Zeng
Third Military Medical University
Author Profile
Lijun Zheng
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding
Author Profile
He Huang
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding
Author Profile
Hairui Wang
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding
Author Profile
jincheng zhong
Southwest Minzu University
Author Profile
Zhihe Zhang
Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda
Author Profile
Liang Zhang
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding
Author Profile
Mingfeng Jiang
Southwest Minzu University
Author Profile

Abstract

To contribute to the conservation of endangered animals, the utilization of model systems is critical to analyze the function of their gut microbiota. In this study, the results of a fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) experiment with germ-free (GF) mice receiving giant panda or horse fecal microbiota showed a clear clustering by donor microbial communities in GF mice, which was consistent with the results of blood metabolites from these mice. At the genus level, FMT re-established approximately 9% of the giant panda donor microbiota in GF mice compared to about 32% for the horse donor microbiota. In line with this, the difference between the panda donor microbiota and panda-mice microbiota on whole-community level was significantly larger than that between the horse donor microbiota and the horse-mice microbiota. These results were consistent with source tracking analysis that found a significantly higher retention rate of the horse donor microbiota (30.9%) than the giant panda donor microbiota (4.0%) in GF mice where the microbiota remained stable after FMT. Further analyses indicated that the possible reason for the low retention rate of the panda donor microbiota in GF mice was a low relative abundance of Clostridiaceae in the panda donor microbiota. Our results indicate that the donor microbiota has a large effect on GF mice microbiota after FMT.