Background: This initiative aimed to elucidate the clinical relevance of type 2 (T2) inflammation as a driver of asthma, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and eosinophilic esophagitis. Methods: A steering committee (SC) conducted a non-systematic literature search to inform the design of a Delphi questionnaire including 23 consensus statements, which was circulated to 30 experts including the SC. Experts rated their agreement with each statement on a 9-point Likert scale and provided optional feedback that was used to develop a second Delphi questionnaire. On 22 October 2020, a meeting was held to discuss the conclusions from the questionnaires and explore how this initiative may impact the management of patients with T2 inflammation-driven disease. Post meeting, a consensus statement on the role of T2 inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis was circulated to the experts. Results: It was agreed that T2 inflammation may be an underlying driver of asthma, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinitis, CRSwNP and eosinophilic esophagitis, and that the published evidence suggests that these diseases overlap. Some of this overlap may include related multimorbid conditions driven by T2 inflammation. Thus, in patients with multiple T2 inflammation-driven diseases, a cross-speciality approach is warranted to provide effective care. A question guide with input from relevant experts was proposed, to identify comorbidities and facilitate appropriate holistic patient management. Conclusions: These consensus recommendations should be used as a framework to further understand the extent of T2 inflammation-driven multi-organ disease and to improve the holistic management and care of these patients.

Background Patients with severe asthma may present with characteristics representing overlapping phenotypes, making them eligible for more than one class of biologic. Our aim was to describe the profile of severe adult asthma patients eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R and to compare the effectiveness of both classes of treatment in real life. Methods This was a prospective cohort study that included adult severe asthma patients from 22 countries enrolled into the International Severe Asthma registry (ISAR) who were eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R. The effectiveness of anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R was compared in a 1:1 matched cohort. Exacerbation rate was the primary effectiveness endpoint. Secondary endpoints included long-term-oral corticosteroid (LTOCS) use, asthma-related emergency room (ER) attendance and hospital admissions. Results In the matched analysis (n=350/group), the mean annualized exacerbation rate decreased by 47.1% in the anti-IL5/5R group and 38.7% in the anti-IgE group. Patients treated with anti-IL5/5R were less likely to experience a future exacerbation (adjusted IRR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64, 0.89; p<0.001) and experienced a greater reduction in mean LTOCS dose than those treated with anti-IgE (37.44% vs 20.55% reduction; p=0.023).) There was some evidence to suggest that patients treated with anti-IL5/5R experienced fewer asthma-related hospitalizations (IRR 0.64; 95% CI 0.38, 1.08), but not ER visits (IRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61, 1.43). Conclusions In real life, both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R improve asthma outcomes in patients eligible for both biologic classes, however anti-IL5/5R was superior in terms of reducing asthma exacerbations and LTOCS use.

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is commonly associated with asthma. Treatment of CRSwNP includes intranasal and systemic corticosteroids, with non-responsive patients commonly considered for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This nationwide register-based study evaluated the incidence, prevalence, and treatment burden of CRSwNP in Finland, and their association with the presence and severity of comorbid asthma. Methods: Electronic health records of patients diagnosed with CRSwNP between 1.1.2012-31.12.2018 in Finnish specialty and primary care were included in the study. The patients were divided into subgroups based on presence, severity, and control of asthma: no asthma, mild to moderate asthma, severe controlled asthma, and severe uncontrolled asthma. A mean cumulative count of ESS was calculated over time per subgroup. Results: The prevalence of CRSwNP increased from 602.2 to 856.7 patients per 100 000 population between years 2012 and 2019 (p < 0.001). A total of 18 563 patients (59.9% male) had incident CRSwNP between 2012 and 2019, with 27% having asthma, 6% having severe asthma, and 1.5% having severe uncontrolled asthma. In the no asthma, severe controlled asthma, and severe uncontrolled asthma subgroups, systemic corticosteroids were used by 54.1%, 94.9% and 99.3% (p < 0.001), respectively, while the ESS count three years post diagnosis was 0.49, 0.68 and 0.80, respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence of CRSwNP showed a significant increase in the recent decade in Finland. Comorbid asthma, and in particular severe asthma, increased the probability of receiving systemic corticosteroids and undergoing ESS. Thus, improved management of CRSwNP in patients with comorbid asthma is urgently needed.