Please note: We are currently experiencing some performance issues across the site, and some pages may be slow to load. We are working on restoring normal service soon. Importing new articles from Word documents is also currently unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.

lisa madder

and 8 more

Objective: Evaluation of the implementation of a new guideline for diagnosis and treatment of women with pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) or ectopic pregnancy (EP). Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study Setting: Six hospitals in the Northern part of the Netherlands Population and methods: Women above 18-years old with a final diagnosis of PUL or EP between January 2012 to April 2020. Main outcome measures: Diagnostic findings, type of treatment and outcomes, before and after implementation of the guideline. User interpretation of the guidelines. Results: 1306 women with PUL or EP were included. The amount of women diagnosed with PUL has significantly increased between the guideline cohorts (28.4%;174/693 versus 16.6%;115/613 P<0.001). A significantly lower percentage of women using the new guideline underwent surgical management versus treatment with MTX (odds ratio [OR] =0.516, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.399 – 0.668 P<0.001). Among women treated with MTX, the overall success rate was significantly lower compared to surgery (80.5%;103/128 versus 95.2%; 943/991 P=0.007). There was no observed difference in adverse events or guideline adherence between the guidelines. Conclusion: The implementation of the new guideline contributes to an increase in women diagnosed with PUL and treated with MTX. Treatment with MTX caused more complications and a lower treatment success compared to women undergoing surgery. This did not lead to an increase in adverse events between the guidelines. The overall adherence to the guidelines was equal.