Please note: We are currently experiencing some performance issues across the site, and some pages may be slow to load. We are working on restoring normal service soon. Importing new articles from Word documents is also currently unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Suleiman Mostamandi

and 5 more

In desert regions like the Middle East (ME), dust has a profound impact on the environment, climate, air quality, and solar devices. The size of dust particles determines the extent of these effects. Dust deposition (DD) measurements show that coarse dust particles with geometric radius r > 10 μm comprise most of the deposited mass. Still, these particles are not represented in the current models that are tuned to fit the observed aerosol visible optical depth (AOD). As a result, the existing models and reanalysis products underestimate DD and dust emission (DE) almost three times. This is the first study to constrain the dust simulations by both AOD and DD measurements to quantify the effect of coarse and fine dust using the WRF-Chem model. We found that, on average, coarse dust contributes less than 10% to dust shortwave (SW) radiative forcing (RF) at the surface but comprises more than 70% of DE. Annual mean net RF over the Arabian Peninsula and regional seas locally reaches -25 W m-2. Airborne fine dust particles with radii r < 3 μm are mainly responsible for the significant dimming (5-10%) of solar radiation, cooling the surface and hampering solar energy production. However, dust mass deposition is primarily linked to coarse particles, decreasing the efficiency of Photovoltaic panels by 2-5% per day. Therefore, incorporating coarse dust in model simulations and data assimilation would improve the overall description of the dust mass balance and its impact on environmental systems and solar devices.
Mineral dust particles originate from a variety of arid regions around the world. Mineral dust directly modifies the Earth’s radiative balance through absorption and scattering. This radiative forcing varies strongly with mineral composition, yet there is still limited knowledge on the mineralogy of global dust source regions. Previously, 65 surface soil samples were collected worldwide, sieved to < 38 μm fraction and analyzed using XRD, SEM and re-suspended to determine scattering and absorption coefficients at three visible wavelengths (Engelbrecht et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 2016). This dust collection represents global surface soils with comparable mineral compositions to windblown dust. For this research, we measured spectra of 26 of these samples selected from major dust source regions with compositional diversity. We measured these samples using laboratory reflectance spectroscopy in the visible and near-infrared (0.4 to 2.5 μm, VNIR) and long-wave infrared (2.5 to 25 μm, LWIR). These data are relevant to satellite imaging spectrometers, but will particularly inform measurements planned for EMIT and SBG. We compared the measured spectra to standard spectral libraries to identify dominant materials and to compare and contrast these with the major minerals identified via XRD. VNIR spectral analysis detected diagnostic absorptions for minerals such kaolinite, calcite, hematite, and goethite. Common silicates, quartz and feldspar, are abundant in the majority of these samples and are expected to have diagnostic features in the LWIR. LWIR reflectance is strongly dependent on particle size (e.g. Salisbury et al., 1991), though the 0-74 μm grain size fraction of pure silicate minerals still show characteristic signatures between 8 and 10 µm. Surprisingly, diagnostic silicate features were not observed in many of the samples. We identified quartz absorptions between 4.8 and 5.4 μm and at 14.3 μm. We are still trying to understand why the fundamental vibrational features of silicates are obscured, but it may be related to multiple overlapping features in mixtures, grain coatings, or anomalous dispersion. LWIR spectra also revealed numerous diagnostic carbonate features, particularly those near 4, 5.6, and 11.4 μm. We also identified carbonate in several samples where it had not been identified with XRD.